In pop culture, girls who crush hopelessly on guys they can’t have are painted as just that – hopeless. Over and over again, we’re taught that girls who openly express sexual or romantic interest in guys who don’t want them are pitiable, stalkerish, desperate, crazy bitches. More often than not, they’re also portrayed as ugly – whether physically, emotionally or both – in order to further establish their undesirability as an objective fact. Both narratively and, as a consequence, in real life, men are given free reign to snub, abuse, mislead and talk down to such women: we’re raised to believe that female desire is unseemly, so that any consequent shaming is therefore deserved. There is no female-equivalent Friend Zone terminology because, in the language of our culture, a man’s romantic choices are considered sacrosanct and inviolable. If a girl has been told no, then she has only herself to blame for anything that happens next – but if a woman says no, then she must not really mean it. Or, if she does, she shouldn’t: the rejected man is a universally sympathetic figure, and everyone from moviegoers to platonic onlookers will scream at her to justgive him a chance, as though her rejection must always be unfounded rather than based on the fact that he had a chance, and blew it. And even then, give him another one! The pathos of Single Nice Guys can only be eased by pity-sex with unwilling women that blossoms into romance!
— Lamenting the Friendzone, or: The Nice Guy Approach to Perpetuating Sexist Bullshit (via nyquilontherocks)

(Source: fozmeadows)

1 year ago with 69,468 notes
originally nyquilontherocks
Posted on August 1st at 2:13 AM
Reblogged from: oneironaughty
Originally posted by: nyquilontherocks
  1. funnyhatsandsarcasm reblogged this from patchworkurchin
  2. regressive-tendencies reblogged this from salvation-in-the-secular-age
  3. patchworkurchin reblogged this from notesonmyhead
  4. notesonmyhead reblogged this from interplanetaryrobot
  5. yelyahashley reblogged this from salvation-in-the-secular-age
  6. salvation-in-the-secular-age reblogged this from biographyofaheartbreak
  7. biographyofaheartbreak reblogged this from implorer
  8. implorer reblogged this from lit-eral
  9. lit-eral reblogged this from de-licacy
  10. sheyler reblogged this from killsmedead
  11. butterfly-and-hurricanes reblogged this from moonaskingtostay
  12. moonaskingtostay reblogged this from virtualalternative
  13. buckandthebees reblogged this from virtualalternative
  14. virtualalternative reblogged this from daunt
  15. starshipranger394 reblogged this from interplanetaryrobot
  16. interplanetaryrobot reblogged this from somethingsomethingriverwoods
  17. callmenagi reblogged this from asslicker2002
  18. tasteslikeaknucklesandwich reblogged this from raxn
  19. screechy-screech reblogged this from a-swell-kind-of-hell
  20. bryt3rlayt3r reblogged this from somethingsomethingriverwoods
  21. zyanjuh reblogged this from somethingsomethingriverwoods
  22. ymequedesuspirando reblogged this from roaschie
  23. roaschie reblogged this from wouldyoulikeacupofchai
  24. wouldyoulikeacupofchai reblogged this from somethingsomethingriverwoods
  25. peaceandelizabethtaylor reblogged this from somethingsomethingriverwoods
  26. somethingsomethingriverwoods reblogged this from receivethesound
  27. keepmethesecret reblogged this from futureabortiondoctor
theme by: heloteixeira
theme by: heloísa teixeira